Steamlikes
Catalog
Bot
MCP
Construction Machines Simulator 2016 — Who recommends this game? | Steamlikes
Steamlikes
Catalog
Bot
MCP
CMS
app/355330
Construction Machines Simulator 2016
PlayWay SA
Simulation
Building
Multiplayer
—
Like Score
—
qualityScore
Price
—
Reviews
121
44% positive
Inbound MLT
0
peers liking this
Lifetime units
—
no estimate
Status
Live
Mixed
Live
Store ↗
|
Community ↗
01
Sales
—
02
Like Score
—
03
Reviews
121
04
Overlap
20 peers
Sales estimate not available yet
Release date is unknown or set in the future. Re-check after the title officially launches.
How sales estimation works →
01
Like Score
qualityScore = Σ inbound · log₁₀(reviews+1) · positive% · rank-bonus
—
QUALITY SCORE
Insufficient data
D
C
B
A
S
Inbound
0
×
Σ log₁₀(R+1)
—
Avg pos%
—
→ —
02
Biggest games linking to you
Steam puts Construction Machines Simulator 2016 in their “More Like This”
No inbound links yet · data refreshes daily
03
Construction Machines Simulator 2016’s “More like this”
Outbound MLT · 30 games
#1
Schedule I
97%
282K
#2
Farming Simulator 25
87%
37K
#3
Rust
87%
1.2M
#4
Very Safe Dino Park 🦖
0%
0
#5
Stardew Valley
98%
881K
#6
Planet Zoo
90%
80K
#7
Satisfactory
97%
232K
#8
Jurassic World Evolution 3
93%
10K
Review score
5
/ 9
Mixed
% positive
44.6%
cohort 71%
54 pos · 67 neg
Total reviews
121
tracked
121 crawled
Velocity · all-time
0 / day
est
121 all-time
Steam-purchase rate
98.3%
flat
1.7% free / EA / key
01
Language distribution
Reviewer interface language · count, share of total, share positive
17 languages · top 12 shown
EN
English
40.5%
49
45%
DE
German
16.5%
20
55%
FR
French
10.7%
13
0%
RU
Russian
5.0%
6
67%
PT
Brazilian Portuguese
5.0%
6
67%
IT
Italian
4.1%
5
60%
TR
Turkish
4.1%
5
40%
ES
Spanish
2.5%
3
33%
ZH
Simplified Chinese
2.5%
3
67%
JA
Japanese
2.5%
3
33%
FI
finnish
1.7%
2
50%
RO
romanian
0.8%
1
100%
02
Reviews by playtime
Hours played at time of review · positive% per bucket
0-1h
32
28
%
positive
26.4% of reviews
refund window
1-10h
56
50
%
positive
46.3% of reviews
10-100h
33
52
%
positive
27.3% of reviews
03
Monthly timeline
Reviews per month · positive vs negative stacked · since launch
Positive 54
Negative 67
11
8
6
3
0
15·06
16·02
16·12
17·10
19·04
20·07
21·11
24·12
25·07
04
Breakdowns
Reviews segmented · count, % of total, % positive
121 reviews
Free product
2
/ 121
1.7% of total
100% positive
Early access
0
/ 121
0.0% of total
— no data
Key activation
0
/ 121
0.0% of total
— no data
Steam Deck
0
/ 121
0.0% of total
— no data
Steam purchase
119
/ 121
98.3% of total
45% positive
Recommended
54
/ 121
44.6% of total
— votedUp
Not recommended
67
/ 121
55.4% of total
— votedDown
Reviews crawled
121
/ 121
100.0% of total
45% positive
Reviewers tracked
121
indexed
20 peers with shared reviewers
Strongest peer
American Truck Simulator
8.3%
10 shared reviewers
Net-new audience
95%
est
115 reviewers no peer shares
Avg overlap
5.3%
3 clusters
across 20 top peers
01
Audience overlap · top peers
Of this game’s reviewers, % who also reviewed each peer
Sort:
% overlap
shared
sentiment
% overlap ▼
Game
Overlap
Shared
Sentiment
American Truck Simulator
10 shared · 80% pos
8.3%
10
80%
Car Mechanic Simulator 2015
10 shared · 100% pos
8.3%
10
100%
Construction Simulator 2015
9 shared · 100% pos
7.4%
9
100%
Portal 2
8 shared · 100% pos
6.6%
8
100%
Just Cause 2
7 shared · 57% pos
5.8%
7
57%
Black Mesa
7 shared · 100% pos
5.8%
7
100%
Farming Simulator 17
6 shared · 83% pos
5%
6
83%
DiRT Rally
6 shared · 83% pos
5%
6
83%
The Long Dark
6 shared · 83% pos
5%
6
83%
Far Cry® 2
6 shared · 67% pos
5%
6
67%
Fishing Planet
6 shared · 100% pos
5%
6
100%
Portal
6 shared · 100% pos
5%
6
100%
Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
6 shared · 83% pos
5%
6
83%
Grand Theft Auto IV: The Complete Edition
6 shared · 83% pos
5%
6
83%
Kerbal Space Program
5 shared · 100% pos
4.1%
5
100%
Far Cry® 5
5 shared · 100% pos
4.1%
5
100%
Far Cry 3
5 shared · 80% pos
4.1%
5
80%
Saints Row IV: Re-Elected
5 shared · 40% pos
4.1%
5
40%
GRID 2
5 shared · 80% pos
4.1%
5
80%
Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020) 40th Anniversary Edition
5 shared · 60% pos
4.1%
5
60%
Showing 20 peers with shared reviewers
